The observed proper motion residuals and their consistent position angles across different time periods may suggest the influence of an unseen gravitational force, which could be indicative of the Nemesis star's existence. Proper motion residuals, which are the differences between observed stellar motions and those predicted by current models, have been noted in several studies. For instance, a study by Luhman (2014) examining the proper motion of WISE 1049-5319 found residuals that could be explained by the gravitational pull of a distant companion star. The consistent position angles of these residuals over time could imply a stable, long-term influence, aligning with the theoretical orbit of Nemesis, which is hypothesized to have an orbital period of approximately 26 million years.
However, these observations alone are not sufficient to confirm Nemesis's existence. Other factors, such as measurement errors or the influence of known celestial bodies, must be considered. For example, the Gaia mission's data release in 2022 provided precise astrometric measurements, which could potentially refine these residuals and their interpretation. The Gaia data suggests that some of the previously noted residuals might be attributed to systematic errors rather than an unseen companion.
Further studies to confirm or refute the Nemesis hypothesis could include:
- Long-Term Astrometric Monitoring: Continuous monitoring of stars with notable proper motion residuals using advanced telescopes like the Vera C. Rubin Observatory, which is expected to start operations in 2025. This could provide more data points to assess the consistency of the residuals over longer periods.
- Direct Imaging Surveys: Employing next-generation telescopes like the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) to search for direct evidence of Nemesis. The JWST's capabilities could potentially detect faint objects in the far reaches of our solar system or beyond.
- Gravitational Microlensing: Using microlensing surveys to detect the presence of a massive object through its gravitational lensing effects on background stars. This method could provide indirect evidence of Nemesis.
- Simulation and Modeling: Advanced simulations incorporating the latest astrometric data to model the potential gravitational influence of Nemesis on the solar system's dynamics. These models could predict observable effects that could be tested against future observations.
It is important to note that while these studies could provide more evidence, the absence of definitive proof thus far does not conclusively disprove the Nemesis hypothesis. The confidence level in the current data supporting Nemesis remains low, with error margins in astrometric measurements typically around 0.1 to 1 milliarcseconds per year. Historical data, such as the periodicity of mass extinctions on Earth, has been cited in support of Nemesis, but this connection remains speculative and requires further investigation to establish a causal link.